Monday, January 30, 2017

On Teaching Vocabulary to Children

Related image

I’ve been reading The Hobbit with my oldest two sons. It’s uniquely enjoyable with each one for different reasons. Jacob, my oldest, is at the age where he can read a paragraph or a page to me, but still encounters quite a few words which are new to him. We reached the part in the book where Bilbo walks down the secret tunnel into the heart of the Lonely Mountain to face the dragon Smaug for the second time, while the troop of dwarves who have traveled with him hang back in the distance, their usual practice. The dragon knows, or guesses, where the dwarves are and refers to their “skulking” in the shadows.
                I knew that “skulking” was a new word for Jacob. After he sounded it out and read it, I asked him what he thought it meant. I chose to use an approach to exploring meaning called “fittingness,” which I first encountered in the writings of Nicholas Wolterstorff.[i] It goes something like this: many things in this world seem to have a natural relationship to one another, even though we can’t objectively quantify that relationship. We might say that blue is sad, red is angry, and yellow is happy. Of course, that’s ridiculous. Colors are merely reflections of light and have no direct relationship to emotions. Yet, the descriptions I listed “fit” with one another, don’t they? They fit together so well that corporations spend fortunes on attaching their brands to specific colors to inspire feelings and behavior. So, I told Jacob that “skulking” is one of those wonderful words in life that sounds like what it means. What does “skulking” sound like? Is it happy or sad? Confident or nervous? Open or secret? Light or dark? Is it trustworthy or tricky? Jacob struggled with this a little. That’s not surprising, it’s a rather intuitive and circuitous way to get at meaning, but ultimately he decided that “skulking” was being dark, sad, nervous, tricky, and secretive (yes, he had a little help from his father).
                Wolterstorff’s “fittingness” is a fun way to get kids to venture out and take a stab at unfamiliar words, but there is a better way, one I wish I had used with Jacob in this instance. Michael Polanyi describes it like this, “in order to analyse the use of a descriptive term we must use it for the purpose of contemplating its subject matter, and an analysis of this contemplation will inevitably extend to the contemplated object.[ii]” The weak point in my exploration of “skulking” with Jacob was that I focused his efforts of understanding on the word itself, when Smaug used the word to describe the actions of others. Our journey, fun as it was, required a good bit of guesswork and a few intuitive leaps. It may have been a nice mental exercise, but discovering the definition of “skulking” shouldn’t have been that hard: it was plain as day, or at least plain as those sad, nervous, tricky, and secretive dwarves. Perhaps the best way to define “skulking” was to ask Jacob who Smaug was referring to when he used the word, and what they were doing that caused him to use it. The dwarves were afraid and hiding in the shadows, happily allowing a little hobbit to do their dangerous work for them. They were “skulking.” To take the conversation to the next level, I could have asked what Smaug hoped to gain in the conversation. He was trying, and succeeding, to sow seeds of mistrust between Bilbo and his dwarf friends. Smaug was describing the dwarves as untrustworthy, and “skulking” is not a term that describes those we trust.
                In summary, I offer two ways help children explore new vocabulary beyond simply telling them the meaning of a word:
1.       “Fittingness” What does the word sound like? What does it feel like? This is something of an obtuse and roundabout way to get to the meaning of a word, but it requires a good bit of imagination and creativity. Probably one best used with close adult guidance and best left for fun explorations at home.
2.       “Subject analysis” What is the word referring to, what is it talking about? What is that thing doing? If your child can describe the subject of the word, he’s probably got the word’s meaning as well. It’s just a matter of making the connection.

One of the benefits of reading Tolkein with five and seven year-olds is that I can be confident it won’t be long until we have the chance to explore the meaning of an unfamiliar word again. Until then, good luck and good parenting.



[i] Nicolas Wolterstorff, Art in Action (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1980), 96.
[ii] Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1974), 116.